You may notice this blog will begin to take “different” directions. Originally I intended for this blog to be an exercise in exploration; an ongoing “research project” so-to-speak. It will remain so, but the spectrum of topics will broaden. I had hoped [one would, naturally] that my research would only uncover benign, well intentioned but perhaps foolhardy legislation and corporate behavior that could be explained without too much “conspiracy theory” involved. Obviously a quick scroll down the page and even the headlines should prove that this hope for a saner, less psychopathic reality turned out to be a little naive.
My personal initiation as a truth seeker began with my learning the philosophy behind honest money and the history of our United States Dollar. As I have written extensively on these subjects before, I only mention it again because the thread of truth I happened to discover in that particular subject has lead me to new injustices, new cover ups, new conspiracies, and consequently a new truth about the world I live in. It is this expansion of consciousness that has kept me interested in geopolitics, finance, political conspiracy and revisionist history but as I trot down this path I find myself broaching subjects that are rarely if ever discussed in mixed company. The further you go down the rabbit hole, the more detached you become from what is commonly accepted as legitimate conversation fodder. In politics, they call this the “Overton Window.”
As Wikipedia puts it,
The Overton window, in political theory, describes a “window” in the range of public reactions to ideas in public discourse, in a spectrum of all possible options on a particular issue. It is named after its originator, Joseph P. Overton, former vice president of the Mackinac Center for Public Policy.
The simplest way to relate to the point I am trying to make is to mention a single phenomenon; U-F-O’s.
Almost everybody has an experience with the overton window principle because almost everybody has SOME sort of opinion on UFO’s. You may have been in a conversation when a friend or relative brought up the subject only to see the unease wash over those participating when such a “crazy” idea like UFOs are discussed. At one time, you yourself might have been appalled at the idea. Or perhaps you believe in extraterrestrial life, but you find it difficult to discuss with anyone because of the stigma attached to such ideas. Whatever the case has been – if you ask your neighbor or friend about it today I believe the nature of that conversation would be vastly different now in 2011 than it would have been in 1990. People seem to be more open to the idea of extraterrestrial life and/or visitors from another world. You might not be called crazy anymore for believing in UFOs, considering over 70% of people in the United States now do. This is because over the last 50 years more people have witnessed them, government documents have been leaked that confirm the phenomena, and new science about our universe is constantly being released which effectively SHIFTS the overton window into the realm or acceptable conversation.
One might think that research topics don’t get much zanier than extra terrestrial visitors, but they do.
So with the overton window principle in mind, think about the following statement:
The western military industrial complex is generating and manipulating weather for the benefit of the few to the detriment of many. This includes the generation of the following: Floods, tornadoes, hurricanes, earthquakes, volcanic eruption, seismic stress, the distribution of harmful chemicals/heavy metals into our atmosphere, and the mass death of birds and fish.
The fact that a statement like that would be met with opposition in regular company is a proof of our own lack of awareness, NOT proof of my own insanity. I’M THE NORMAL ONE. This is not a huge secret – the information is out there and it is right in front of your face. The fact that it is NOT a topic of conversation speaks to how well our masters have conditioned us to accept the tyranny they want to impose!
From FIRST PARAGRAPH of the wikipedia article on WEATHER CONTROL:
Weather control is the act of manipulating or altering certain aspects of the environment to produce desirable changes in weather. Weather control can have the goal of preventing damaging weather, such as hurricanes or tornadoes, from occurring; of causing beneficial weather, such as rainfall in an area experiencing drought; or of provoking damaging weather against an enemy or rival, as a tactic of military or economic warfare. Weather modification in warfare has been banned by the United Nations.
Let’s be clear;
provoking damaging weather against an enemy or rival, as a tactic of military or economic warfare.
This is all public information available for you to learn about, yet, if you go ask any eco-chic global warming trendy what he/she thinks about chemtrails or cloud seeding you will likely be met with a blank stare. Go so far as to say that our government would purposely generate floods, and you’ll probably be immediately dismissed…Yet this is not the holy grail of conspiracy theory, it’s just an outright FACT!
Earlier this year, after the horrific Tsunami and Earthquake which ravaged Japan I discovered a man who claimed to have predicted the earthquake based on information he received from Japanese high level financiers. His name is Benjamin Fulford and he was the Asian Bureau chief of Forbes Magazine for 7 years. His video on the subject can be viewed below:
This all seemed so crazy to me. Impossible! Definitely within the “Unthinkable” range on my overton window graphic above – but now [acting as a truth seeker] I had to research more. As it turned out, Benjamin Fulford had some credibility holes but something in my gut told me there was more to this story than just one person making one claim. After more research I found that for every credibility hole Fulford had, there was an equal or greater slice of truth to what he was saying. After watching his video – I searched HAARP, earthquake weapons, weather control, and more. Yes, I had heard of Chemtrails before but didn’t pay much attention to the topic at the time. I still had it [foolishly] in the “radical” range of my personal overton window. The subject definitely needed more attention.
Soon after discovering HAARP, I was lead to Nikola Tesla, the defamed inventor from the early 1900’s who is considered by many to be profoundly genius. Allegedly his patents contained the science and technology behind what I would call “the manipulation and exploitation of resonant frequencies.” One of the most infamous stories related to earthquake machines and Tesla was his invention of a piston-like device that could be adjusted to operate at the resonant frequency of whatever it was attached to. In a New York World telegram, Earl Sparling writes about Tesla’s earthquake machine:
…[Tesla] he revealed that an earthquake which drew police and ambulances to the region of his laboratory at 48 E. Houston St. in 1887 or 1888 was the result of a little machine he was experimenting with at that time which “you could put in your overcoat pocket.”
This story has since become legend, and was even tested on the popular Discovery Channel show Mythbusters where Jamie and Adam test this theory. Even in the episode, Adam must stop the experiment because the device he tried to replicate began to shake a bridge so violently it could be compared to a tractor trailer being driven on the bridge. Unfortunately, the test could not continue to find out if the bridge would fall because, well, that would be quite destructive. They claimed the myth was “busted.”
In the most layman terms, the concept behind an “earthquake machine” is that a microwave can beam waves at a certain layer of the earth which, if tuned correctly, will resonate with that material and cause it to become increasingly excited and eventually shake. This may cause a fault line to slip. It is often compared to how a singer is able to sing at the resonant frequency of a wine glass;
Unthinkable! Impossible! Nobody would ever believe such a thing! Weather modification can’t happen!
Ok, well how about this?
NOOO! Rain clouds are way different than earthquakes. Clouds are one thing, earthquakes are different.
But wait – I was able to find legitimate science behind this! In fact, I discovered entire DOCUMENTARIES on the subject, patents, quotes from military and government officials, and even a company that SELLS weather modification. Yet this is not acceptable conversation?
Those of you who live on the East Coast of the United States may well have had your first earthquake experience last week. If your experience was anything like mine, there was something very interesting about this quake – it just seemed weird. Well, not too long after the quake happened rumors began to circulate that this was not a “natural” quake. The research and anamolies with this quake are well documented and well categorized here at Intel Hub:
This is a documentary called Weather Warfare, which goes over some of the history of weather modification, how HAARP works, and where some of the original technology/theories come from. Well put together and very interesting;
After watching this it was not too long before I discovered Jesse Ventura’s special on HAARP:
His work comes highly recommended:
So other than youtube videos and the testimony of self-admitted internet investigators, what evidence is there?
Former Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen states in this 1997 DoD briefing;
…Others are engaging even in an eco- type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves.
So there are plenty of ingenious minds out there that are at work finding ways in which they can wreak terror upon other nations. It’s real, and that’s the reason why we have to intensify our efforts, and that’s why this is so important.
http://www.weathermodification.com -> Check out the list of Clients!
One of the most important questions to ask is the same question which fuels this blog; why would someone do this? Or – Who benefits? This is critical because it establishes a motivation to commit egregious crimes. An argument is never bolstered when the only answer to this question seems to be “Evil.” Reality is a lot more common sense than lofty philosophic topics such as Good Vs. Evil. Like most things, the answer of course has to do with MONEY.
For example; you may remember the Army Engineers blew a levee in early May which caused massive flooding of America’s midwestern farmlands. Subsequently the farmers received letters from the Federal Government with offers to PURCHASE their land for severely marked down prices. Food Freedom’s wordpress goes over this in much more detail.
Amazingly there are also financial instruments called Weather Derivatives which, put simply, is a bet for or against a certain type of weather occurring in a given area. The wikipedia would have you believe it is mostly farmers or insurance companies hedging their bets to minimize risk of natural disasters. It sounds good (and does happen), but what happens when you are betting on something that is supposed to be either in a predictable cycle or occurring from pure chance but has been co-opted by a military industrial network of corporate interests? You get massive profits for insiders who know EXACTLY what/when the weather will be!
A short little intro on how these are traded can be found here.
These facts raise even more issues about the specter of man-made global warming. Ignoring the fact that C02 is part of the earth’s lifecycle and necessary for the propogation of plants and animals, let’s say we do directly impact the heat of the earth through the emission of C02, do we not also have the technology to create favorable weather conditions to counteract said distortion? Do we not have the tools and resources to make deserts green and the oceans blue? The answer is yes – but these tools are not at the disposal of the sovereign citizens of the world – they are in the hands of a relative few industrial, military companies and agencies who have weaponized them. This is a tool not just to make massive amounts of money but it is also a tool of social control, consolidation of power, and indirectly; genocide.
At the end of the day, we all believe in conspiracies. It is a part of human nature to make connections, understand how the world works, and be curious. The question is, how much evidence must be presented before you believe? Then, once you believe, what will you do about it?